The past week saw the greatest controversy in a year ignited by the seemingly racist comments of the 79 year old Nobel Laureate James Watson.
Watson who shared his Nobel with Francis Crick, and Maurice Wilkins for the discovery of the Double-helical structure of DNA, had always been at the helm of controversies mostly b’coz of [...]
Archive for the ‘Politics of science’ Category
Watson… Watson… where is your proof?
Posted in Politics of science, Public Understanding of science, Science and society, evolving intelligence on October 27, 2007 | 1 Comment »
Evolutionary Socialism: Still more to talk about !
Posted in Evolutionary biology, Philosophy of science, Politics of science, Public Understanding of science, Science and society, evolving intelligence on July 7, 2007 | 8 Comments »
The previous article, Why Should Darwinism be Capitalistic?, invited criticism from many of my ‘evolutionist’ friends. Some were against the anti-deterministic underpinnings of the article – they were reluctant to come to terms with the ‘Nature via Nurture’ hypothesis. Others were against my suggestion that Darwinism can be supportive of Socialism rather than capitalism. What [...]
Why Should Darwinism be Capitalistic?
Posted in Philosophy of science, Politics of science, Science and society on June 23, 2007 | Leave a Comment »
Darwinian and neo-Darwinian ideas of natural selection, differential extinction and adaptive evolution have traditionally been linked to capitalistic views of “survival of the fittest”. As decades passed by, people including the scientific community at large began seeing Darwinian Laws of evolution (its not just a theory any more) as a justification for the greed, consumerism, [...]
